Programme Types
Common Questions
You can, but it complicates the issue of
control and responsibility. Once you take contributors away from
their every day actions and 'direct' them, we then assume
responsibility and have to ensure that they are competent to do
that activity. For example if the Director asks the contributor to
liven up the diary and go ice skating with the camera, then the
production is responsible for all aspects of the piece. However if
the contributor decides to go ice skating under their own volition,
having been trained in aspects of safe places and safe ways to
film, then the responsibility lies to a much greater extent with
the contributor.
If a contributor injures them selves while
recording for the BBC with BBC equipment who is
responsible?
That will depend on what we have done to ensure
the safety of the contributor and the balance of responsibility
will be ascertained from that. If we simply give the contributor a
camera, a pat on the head and say off you go, get something
exciting, them we will be in a very weak position. If we provide
adequiate training, instruction and guidance, correct equipment,
then we have fulfilled our obligations, if the contributor then
decides to ignore our instruction and training and comes to harm,
then we would have very good defence.
Yes. We are at work and so the law is there to
protect us where ever we are. Even where people volunteer, the law
still applies to them even if they are not being paid. No
exceptions are made because we are making TV or Radio.
Do the builders working for the BBC on DIY
programmes have to build to any particular standard or can we botch
it for the programme?
If you do a botch job you may end up in
prison! All work must be done to building
standards and compliant to health and safety law and
guaranteed. Any work done should be built to last the normal
life span and there is no walking away from the
responsibility. If things start falling apart
because of our shoddy workmanship then the BBC will have to pay for
the renovation.
